BLANK (as in the text) |
WITH STUDENT SUMMARY |
| I. INTRODUCTION |
I. INTRODUCTION - OACLLS VIPR TAD - Common law or UCC; sometimes crossover w/Torts, Con Law, & Property |
| A. MBE Exam Coverage |
A. MBE Exam Coverage |
| 1. Weight and Format |
1. Weight and Format - 34 of 200 questions; 50% covers offer, acceptance & defenses |
| 2. Testing Areas |
2. Testing Areas - 75% common law, 25% UCC (note areas where common law and UCC differ |
| 3. Requirements |
3. Requirements - “will claim prevail?” or “what is best/worst argument for recovery?” or “will claim succeed/fail if x does/does not occur?” |
| B. Approach |
B. Approach - note words in quotation marks and single topic questions |
| 1. Conclusion and Conditional Modifiers |
1. Conclusion and Conditional Modifiers - reasoning is more important than conclusion; note modifiers |
| 2. Preferred Result |
2. Preferred Result - all else being equal, odds favor K exists |
| C. Overall Common Law Memory Ladder Acronym |
C. Overall Memory Ladder Acronym - OACLLS VIPR TAD |
| D. Common Law v. UCC Distinction |
D. Common Law v. UCC Distinction - identify the governing law in first sentence of answer |
| 1. UCC Intention of Reasonableness |
1. UCC Intention of Reasonableness - requires less precision |
| 2. Application |
2. Application - does UCC or common law apply? |
| a. Common Law - SIR |
a. Common Law - SIR - real estate, professional services, construction, and personal services |
| b. Goods |
b. UCC - sale of “goods” - movable items |
| c. Distinction |
c. Distinction - can be subtle - book sale & repair |
| d. Mixed Contract |
d. Mixed Contract - predominate factor for K governs |
| e. Examples |
e. Examples - computer + service K=UCC; construction materials + labor=Common Law |
| 3. UCC Default Provisions |
3. UCC Default Provisions - UCC default provisions fill gaps |
| 4. Duty to Communicate |
4. Duty to Communicate - UCC may impose; none under common law |
| 5. Merchant v. Casual Party |
5. Merchant v. Casual Party - special provisions if deals in goods or is expert; usually seller M |
| 6. Application by Analogy |
6. Application by Analogy - good faith and duty to mitigate damages |
| E. Express or Implied |
E. Express or Implied |
| 1. Express Contract |
1. Express Contract - oral or written agreement |
| 2. Implied Contract |
2. Implied Contract - necessary intent exhibited by actions of parties |
| a. Implied in Fact |
a. Implied in Fact - real contract but no agreement on price/fee |
| b. Implied in Law |
b. Implied in Law - avoid unjust enrichment, quasi contract, Quantum Meruit |
| F. Acceptance by Promise or Act |
F. Acceptance by Promise or Act |
| 1. Bilateral |
1. Bilateral - promisor seeking a return promise from promisee, both promises enforceable |
| 2. Unilateral |
2. Unilateral - seeking performance of the act required, example reward offer |